One thing I love about American culture, is that we really don't
pay attention to problems until they are considered BIG by the
media. If one person gets bubonic plague, meeh....who cares? If
a whole town comes down with it....OH MY GOSH, we are all going to
die!
That is my take on the whole Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre.
I started to right a blog three months ago about the Aurora-Batman
Rises shooting. I did some research on it and started to write an
outline for it then came to the conclusion, why bother, there will
be another mass killing in a month or two, I will just wait until
then. (while writing this, there was another mass killing, when
the New England resident set fire to his home and the started
shooting the first responders)
Well, that time has arrived, so I might as well dust it off.
Guns don't kill people, people kill people....and people with semi-
automatic rifles kill a lot MORE people.
Guns are everywhere, banning them now is like shooting the horse
after the battle is over. It is better to have avoided the battle
and use the horse to plow fields. Why not tighten up on ammunition
sales? Or better yet, make it a requirement that anyone that buys
ammunition be required to go through a mental health check every 6
months? They can be issued a little ammunition card that has to be
renewed like a debit card to buy bullets. Just a thought, never
going to happen.
But then again, If I want to kill a bunch of people, I have the
option of fertilizer bombs, gasoline incineration, mowing
pedestrians down with a car, the list is endless. If you are
deranged enough to do the deed, you will probably find a way. The
guns just make it easier.
The attached graph shows major mass killings over the past 40
years. They are increasing, but then again, so is the population.
Interestingly enough, they are getting more deadly. Less wounded
and more deaths. I suppose that means that the killers are just
getting more efficient.
But this graph shows the spikes. The high body counts. I am
certain that the number of 'individuals' that are murdered on a
daily basis due to gun violence is probably much higher than the
numbers on this graph. Again, it is our obsession with the big
numbers that moves us toward discussing change.
Which is what really gets me upset. The problem is long standing
and ongoing. Proper supervision and mental health screening is
going to stop most of these murders, not gun control.
As a culture, we have been trained to have a threshold of
acceptance. A degree to which we will accept things that should not
happen.
Traffic - Our acceptance of risk of accident or injury and our
willingness to spend three hours a day commuting when there is
obviously a better way to get to work and go shopping, but it
requires change to our routine and a loss of our personal freedom,
which we just can't let go of, even if it is for our own good.
Burglary - We no longer consider the concept of no crime and
that our homes are safe and secure. We now accept the reality that we are going
to be burglarized or vandalized at some point. It is just a matter
of how often and at what cost. Instead of increased law
enforcement, we have home security and higher insurance premiums.
Truancy - Back in my day (yes I am old) any teenager walking the
streets during the week would be picked up and hauled into the
police station. School was a requirement or it was off to reform
school for you kiddo. Go to any mall in a large city today and count the
number of slackers that hang out at the food court smoking
cigarettes.
Check Cashing Stores - If you don't have a social security number
or want to lay low so that the cops or your ex-wife can't find you,
where do you cash your check? There is a whole industry that has
sprung up that will take care of that for you, for a fee. Now,
someone with wage garnishment or who owes alimony can cash their
check and not get caught, thank goodness.
As a society, we have come to accept this loss of structure,
because we are not willing to devote the resources (taxes) to
maintan it and instead have left it up to the individual to
deal with on their own. Better buy a gun to protect your property,
send you children to private school, buy a really 'safe' car and
keep a minimum balance of $10,000 in your checking account.
With increased condensed populations comes increased mental health
issues. The key to combating this is to promote more social
interaction (in person) and get people out of their homes and into
a community situation. Folks that fester in front of their Xbox or
Playstation for years on end are not going to be well adjusted
citizens.
We have been killing ourselves, in slow mass suicide, over the past
decades with our lifestyles. With the processed foods that we eat,
the pollution that we have created and the greenhouse gases that we
have unleashed. But since the effects are only noticed in small
numbers, we don't really see the danger.
If we advertised eating apples instead of 'Thick and Chuncky
Spaghetti Sauce' from a can, if we promoted riding a bike or
walking to work instead of commuting on freeways, if we encouraged
everyone to learn to play a musical instrument or a speak a second
language (so we would learn to interact with others), there just
might be fewer mass shootings in the world.
However, this isn't what the media and its advertiser backers want
us to believe. They want us to eat more snack cakes, buy more cars
and sit at home and watch more television.
Hence, expect a lot more mass killings in the future. This isn't
a gun problem, this is a societal problem. Think outside the box
people. Stop trying to treat the symptoms. Cure the social
disease!
This isn't an issue of numbers, it is an issue of behavior. In the
two weeks after the Sandy Hook massacre, over 200 people were
killed in the United States due to gun related deaths. This figure
may be low, since it does not take into account suicides by gun,
only homicides. This is not an issue of how we kill, but why we
kill. Why anyone would take the life of another human being
relates to frustration, mental illness, hatred, bigotry, envy, etc.
All things that have to due with someones mental state.
If we take away ALL the guns, these individuals will still commit
crime and murder, but on a less massive scale. So, are we going to
draw the line and say that 200 murders a week is acceptable, or are
we going to say that murder is unacceptable?
Timothy McVay killed 44 people in Oklahoma City because he was
upset with the government. We haven't banned fertilizer yet to
make bombs with. Any jealous lover can take an SUV and plow down
their estranged spouse at a bus stop, killing all the bystanders as
well. Are we going to make bus stops more secure or outlaw SUVs?
We need a system that will identify and aide the people who are
going to commit these act before they do them. However, no one
wants to discuss this because it takes a lot of resources and
raises the specter of 'Big Brother' keeping tabs on us and
infringes on our personal freedoms. No one is going to submit to
a monthly mental health check to make sure that they have not gone
nuts in the last 30 days and be required to turn in their knives,
guns and car keys.
What we need to do is commit to creating a culture where it is more
acceptable to discuss our problems, instead of solving them with
violence. I find it hypocritical, that tasteful sexual content is
outlawed on public media in the United States, but that the drawing
of a weapon to solve a problem on television happens dozens of
times each evening during primetime.
The mental state of this country is one of 'reaction' and is not
'pro-active'. Our mindset is to treat the symptom in hopes of cost
savings and that hopefully the illness will eventually just go
away.
Until we start to really address these issues, and stop talking
about 'banning' things that cause violence and putting 'armed'
police in schools, nothing is going to change. It will require a
long term social change over a generation. Not a one time fix with
the passage of a 'Gun Law'.
Segregation was wrong back in the
1950s. We could have said, give those uppity African Americans
more money and hopefully they will settle down. But that would not
have addressed the issue. We passed laws to make them all equal.
Just passing the law didn't make them equal. We had to institute
social change over generations to undo the hatred and bigotry that
Jim Crow had fostered.
We will need to do something similar to
address the epidemic of violence in this society. My fear is, that
we will need to go through a lot more killing before people finally
start to wake up and stop listening to what the media tells us to
do, and we start telling the media what to do.